QA plays a very crucial role in delivering quality software into the market and also helps in organization overall growth.
i) Production testing ensures less time to market: Testing in production is a significant way to check performance of the software with real data. It helps in determining application’s performance in real time and determines how application behaves in weak connections or network failure.
ii) Automation saves manual time: Test cases can be converted into test scripts(automated) during application development. This helps in increasing overall test coverage along with reducing the manual efforts. It also increases the Reusability of test scripts when the OS or device changes.
QA designers and IT organizations are regularly asked by the clients when testing a software application — whether to select manual software testing alternatives or give an attempt to new automated systems.
There are some cases, in which software automation testing rules but at the same time, it could end up costing you more than it’s worth. This is the reason because of which you must consider the expenses and advantages according to the project.
Manual testing is a process of testing each and every program individually and making the comparison of the outcomes with that of expectations. Manual testing is a procedure in which tester utilizes the program as a user and encounters functionality to check whether every one of the features is working appropriately or not.
Various tools are utilized by testers in order to execute automated testing services. Automated testing is a process in which the tests of a software application are pre-scripted and the software tools execute these pre-scripted tests before it is released into production. It makes use of automation tools to write and execute test cases. Therefore, no manual involvement is required while executing an automated test suite.
Any testing that is being performed for more than two or three times in a short span of time can be automated with paid and/or open source tools. Execution of unit tests, functional tests, continuous integration, and continuous deployment are common ways of utilizing automation for the greatest benefit.
With the growing demand for mobile applications, new applications are developed in order to cater various platforms. Therefore, it has become imperative to have a robust automation framework that can help automate applications on any platform. A framework is a combination of test-data handling, coding standards, and object repository management that are followed during automation scripting which results in producing beneficial outcomes such as re-usage of the same code in multiple projects, higher portability and decreases the script maintenance cost etc.
In today’s business area and economy, sparing cash is the highest priority on the rundown for any organization.
Testing is an essential part of any effective programming venture. The type of testing (manual or computerized) relies on upon different components, including Project prerequisites, spending plan, the course of events, skill, and relevance.
Three imperative components of any project are time, cost, and quality – the objective of any effective project is to diminish the cost and time required to finish it effectively while keeping up quality yield. With concerns to testing goals, one write may fulfill this objective superior to the next.
Manual testing is best suited to the following scenarios:
Exploratory Testing: This testing requires the analyzer’s learning, background, diagnostic/consistent abilities, imagination, and instinct. The test is described here by inadequately composed detail documentation, and additionally a brief timeframe for execution. We require the human aptitudes to execute the testing procedure in this situation.
Usability Testing: This is user-friendly testing in which we have to understand, effective, or advantageous the product or item is for the end users. Here, human observation is the most critical element, so a manual approach is ideal.
Ad-hoc Testing: It is an absolutely unarranged technique for testing where the comprehension and knowledge of the analyzer are the main essential component.
Automated testing is best suited for the following scenarios:
Regression Testing: Here, automated testing is suitable because of frequent code changes and the ability to run the regressions in a timely manner.
Load Testing: It is the best way to complete the testing efficiently when it comes to loading testing.
Repeated Execution: Testing which requires the repeated execution of a task is best automated.
Performance Testing: Similarly, performance testing requires the simulation of thousands of concurrent users requires automation.
After knowing all advantages and disadvantages of manual and automation testing, it is easy to choose that which type of testing is useful in a particular situation. For excellence software testing, both testing methods are required and both should be studied wisely because those values describe the core of Software QA.
How reporting framework helps automation test report: After test suite executions using TestNG or Junit, by default they will give the HTML reports, but the information provided by these reports are not so good in terms of one page summary of the test, though that can also be emailed to the team and stakeholders of the project but still have good scope of improvement.
To avoid this, we have other options like XSLT reports, these are much better than normal TestNG and Junit reports. These will give a pie chart to represent the PASS, FAIL and SKIP test cases. For more info click here.
In today’s era, most of the enterprises and QA managers are adopting automation testing to speed up the test time to market and thereby enhancing the software quality.
Automated testing tools are capable of executing the test cases, reporting the outcomes and comparison of results with the previous test runs. Tests that are once carried out with these tools can be run repeatedly. But one thing to be considered is that all the test automation projects do not deliver expected ROI and success. The reason could be a utilization of wrong test practices. The testers implement the test automation tools even if they are not aware of the right procedures which reduce the effectiveness of test automation. For more information click here.