Why to choose HP UFT: Automation testing tool

sddefault

Why HP Unified Functional Testing is useful?

– Functional tests are carried out automatically to increase the speed and cost-effectiveness of application development and delivery.

– Initially, little effort is required to record and configure a script. Later on, the script can be used and run again and again to verify the functionality of an application under test.

– This results in saving a lot of time and money over manual testing.

– This tool is very useful in case of regression testing when tests are executed again and again to check whether the existing functionalities are still working fine.

Read more at – https://goo.gl/J6XRJr

The Need for Mobile Automation Testing Services

Testing of mobile apps is a critical process and due importance should be given to it so that the apps are released in the market in a well – suitable manner, meeting the budgetary needs.

In the present scenario, it is important that the solutions offered for mobile app testing provide for continuous integrated testing for both native as well as web based apps. This must also allow the testers to create, amend, or implement the tests in a jiffy. Companies can also integrate their test products with a continuous integration server, and consequently release incremental builds on the same day. The automation would cover all the unit, functional, and performance tests.

mobile-automation

As a tester, you must know what the app’s function is and whether it can perform the function it is intended to. You must also know how people are going to use it. It is said that testers usually subscribe to the outside of the box thinking methodology. They try out things differently, satisfying the “What if” and “Why” question in them diligently.

For example, mobile app testers often assume the thought process of different kinds of customers. This helps them don the avatar of different customers so they can analyze, think and execute tests from different scenarios. This experience can be quite enlightening!

About manual testing: It may be a painstaking process involving many manual hours, making it quite expensive. This can also result in errors because of the human testing aspect. However, manual testing serves an important purpose by providing a process for receiving valuable feedback on the usability of the application. For mobile applications, usability is a very precarious factor. In fact, in many apps, the usability becomes the only unique selling proposition (USP). That being said, if a human being is not interacting with it on a real mobile device, it is really difficult to envision how user-friendly your app is.

Continuous Mobile Application Testing

How can we ensure continuous testing when the development of the mobile app is still going on? How can we ensure if the updates and enhancements are functioning properly? The Answer is using your eyeballs and fingers!

A plethora of apps and devices in which these are lodged make it unavoidable for the eyeballs and fingers method to be the only way testing apps, at least in the current circumstance. This is where the importance and need for mobile automation testing services arises. You should conduct both manual as well as automation testing in the pre-release and post-release lifecycle of the application.

ReadHow to perform Mobile Automation using a Framework?

Disadvantages

Though it stenches advantages, manual testing can also be tetchy for the following reasons:

  • Leaves a huge margin for errors,
  • Slows down the development process drastically,
  • Lowers the confidence of the developers by releasing the quality software in a short amount of time.

At BugRaptors, we are global leaders in software testing and quality assurance services. Veterans in web and mobile automation testing, we are focused to yield the finest software testing service solutions. Visit our website today for more insights.

 

How to perform Mobile Test Automation using a Framework?

Test-Automation-Frameworks-1024x576.png

With the growing demand for mobile applications, new applications are developed in order to cater various platforms. Therefore, it has become imperative to have a robust automation framework that can help automate applications on any platform. A framework is a combination of test-data handling, coding standards, and object repository management that are followed during automation scripting which results in producing beneficial outcomes such as re-usage of the same code in multiple projects, higher portability and decreases the script maintenance cost etc.

Read more – https://goo.gl/9Fz80f

Manual Testing Vs. Automated Testing – From A Tester’s Viewpoint:

1.jpg

In today’s business area and economy, sparing cash is the highest priority on the rundown for any organization.

Testing is an essential part of any effective programming venture. The type of testing (manual or computerized) relies on upon different components, including Project prerequisites, spending plan, the course of events, skill, and relevance.

Three imperative components of any project are time, cost, and quality – the objective of any effective project is to diminish the cost and time required to finish it effectively while keeping up quality yield. With concerns to testing goals, one write may fulfill this objective superior to the next.

automation-testing-vs-manual-testing

Manual testing is best suited to the following scenarios:

  1. Exploratory Testing: This testing requires the analyzer’s learning, background, diagnostic/consistent abilities, imagination, and instinct. The test is described here by inadequately composed detail documentation, and additionally a brief timeframe for execution. We require the human aptitudes to execute the testing procedure in this situation.
  2. Usability Testing: This is user-friendly testing in which we have to understand, effective, or advantageous the product or item is for the end users. Here, human observation is the most critical element, so a manual approach is ideal.
  3. Ad-hoc Testing: It is an absolutely unarranged technique for testing where the comprehension and knowledge of the analyzer are the main essential component.

Automated testing is best suited for the following scenarios:

  1. Regression Testing: Here, automated testing is suitable because of frequent code changes and the ability to run the regressions in a timely manner.
  2. Load Testing: It is the best way to complete the testing efficiently when it comes to loading testing.
  3. Repeated Execution: Testing which requires the repeated execution of a task is best automated.
  4. Performance Testing: Similarly, performance testing requires the simulation of thousands of concurrent users requires automation.

Check out – Some of the major key factors to create a test automation framework.

Final Words:

After knowing all advantages and disadvantages of manual and automation testing, it is easy to choose that which type of testing is useful in a particular situation. For excellence software testing, both testing methods are required and both should be studied wisely because those values describe the core of Software QA.

 

 

 

Why to choose selenium for test automation?

Why-Migrate-to-Selenium-1.jpg

As we all know Selenium is getting popular as an automation testing tool (especially for their UI and functionality) for testing different types of websites. We are going to talk about some of the important reasons to use Selenium for Test Automation which are given below:

1. It is very productive for automation testing as it is an Open Source testing tool.

2. It gets easier to create test cases using Selenium IDE (Integrated Development Environment).

3. It supports multiple browsers like Chrome, IE 6, 7, 8, Mozilla Firefox, Opera and Safari.

Read more – https://goo.gl/8Ed8fe

How reporting framework helps automation test report

MixedMode

How reporting framework helps automation test report: After test suite executions using TestNG or Junit, by default they will give the HTML reports, but the information provided by these reports are not so good in terms of one page summary of the test, though that can also be emailed to the team and stakeholders of the project but still have good scope of improvement.

To avoid this, we have other options like XSLT reports, these are much better than normal TestNG and Junit reports. These will give a pie chart to represent the PASS, FAIL and SKIP test cases. For more info click here.

Tips to improve effectiveness of Test automation & ROI

In today’s era, most of the enterprises and QA managers are adopting automation testing to speed up the test time to market and thereby enhancing the software quality.

ROI-NewsAutomated testing tools are capable of executing the test cases, reporting the outcomes and comparison of results with the previous test runs. Tests that are once carried out with these tools can be run repeatedly. But one thing to be considered is that all the test automation projects do not deliver expected ROI and success. The reason could be a utilization of wrong test practices. The testers implement the test automation tools even if they are not aware of the right procedures which reduce the effectiveness of test automation. For more information click here.