Manual Testing Vs. Automated Testing – From A Tester’s Viewpoint:

1.jpg

In today’s business area and economy, sparing cash is the highest priority on the rundown for any organization.

Testing is an essential part of any effective programming venture. The type of testing (manual or computerized) relies on upon different components, including Project prerequisites, spending plan, the course of events, skill, and relevance.

Three imperative components of any project are time, cost, and quality – the objective of any effective project is to diminish the cost and time required to finish it effectively while keeping up quality yield. With concerns to testing goals, one write may fulfill this objective superior to the next.

automation-testing-vs-manual-testing

Manual testing is best suited to the following scenarios:

  1. Exploratory Testing: This testing requires the analyzer’s learning, background, diagnostic/consistent abilities, imagination, and instinct. The test is described here by inadequately composed detail documentation, and additionally a brief timeframe for execution. We require the human aptitudes to execute the testing procedure in this situation.
  2. Usability Testing: This is user-friendly testing in which we have to understand, effective, or advantageous the product or item is for the end users. Here, human observation is the most critical element, so a manual approach is ideal.
  3. Ad-hoc Testing: It is an absolutely unarranged technique for testing where the comprehension and knowledge of the analyzer are the main essential component.

Automated testing is best suited for the following scenarios:

  1. Regression Testing: Here, automated testing is suitable because of frequent code changes and the ability to run the regressions in a timely manner.
  2. Load Testing: It is the best way to complete the testing efficiently when it comes to loading testing.
  3. Repeated Execution: Testing which requires the repeated execution of a task is best automated.
  4. Performance Testing: Similarly, performance testing requires the simulation of thousands of concurrent users requires automation.

Check out – Some of the major key factors to create a test automation framework.

Final Words:

After knowing all advantages and disadvantages of manual and automation testing, it is easy to choose that which type of testing is useful in a particular situation. For excellence software testing, both testing methods are required and both should be studied wisely because those values describe the core of Software QA.

 

 

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s